User Profile

Just finished the last compilation in the METAtropolis series and it is a mixed bag. I was pretty happy with the final two stories in the series which had Bashar reprising his role and the general timeline development across stories and characters which took us from a recent collapse world to what is probably 120 years later.

The first book in the series really felt like a certain idealism, horizontalism, and anti-capitalism diffuse amongst the stories. as the series, and the world, goes on capitalism, class stratification and political power creep back in as it is consolidated and exercised in the radical and new forms of life that developed in the first series.

Positives is carnies made their first appearance in the universe in this book, negatives beyond the above mentioned development in the universe is that the stories just came off more "action-adventure" and less world building and social questions explored.

And there wasn't a new stories from my favourite Ukrainian nuclear fall out specialist !?!

Anyways, jay Lake, the editor and an author from the series died after a fight with cancer a year after this was published and with his passing, the world's of METAtropolis were retired.

RIP Jay RIP METAtropolis

First off, I am dying for mingrelin khachapuri with the cheese inside and the cheese on top.....

Anyways this is an old memoir from a English journalist living and flailing about in Georgia in a time where wars with ethnic cleansing were rampant in the region, power was spotty and on maybe 1-2 hours a day, and drugs, desperation, and no work was rampant in Georgia. It was a really good read, and while the landmarks, friendliness and warmth, beauty, and prose were all very familiar and nostalgic, the Georgia I travelled in has come along away. With a stable electrical grid, low crime rates, little drug use outside of club drugs (fentanyl is still a problem there too) and some work and some forms of stability it really seems like things have improved for the lives of people in the country.

Wendell writes well, and tells stories -- some of her own, more of local people and adventurous journalist expat types -- which tie in the regions long history and experiences within the USSR with the 90's conflicts that inform so much contempt and politics in the region today.

All in all, it really want some khachapuri.

I was really curious about this book more for its author than because I really needed to learn about the Russian Revolution. China Mieville is a pretty successful sci-fi and fantasy author whose works blend surrealism, fantasy, and politics. But beyond his successful fiction he also writes and edits an unconventional communist journal called Salvage from England and publishes some non-fiction like this book on the Russian Revolution.

From the introduction Mieville responds to the unasked question," why do we need another history book about the Russian revolution?" By suggesting that rather than being just another history text that he undertook an attempt to write a narrative of the revolution that follows it from its embers to insurrection.

It read confidently as a hybrid narrative/history book which prioritizes the debates, actions, and tensions of the revolution over citations and scholars opinions on it. That being said, this narrative does take the Bolsheviks as the protagonists, follows them and Lenin most closely and regularly reflects the tensions and power struggles amongst intellectuals and party members, and secondarily the tensions between the vanguard and the Russian people, whose aims and desires don't often line up. Truthfully the "leaders" are presented as perpetually trying to catch up or tamp down the insurrectionary actions of the streets.

I think there are so many interesting people in the revolution but as is the case of history, this won still disproportionately tells the story of the victors. The people in the streets, the anarchists, soldiers and their wives, factory workers, beggars, and terrorists feature as secondary characters moving the story forward but as a supporting role to the debates and discussions of the central committee, Soviets and duma in their power struggles.

All in all, well written and presented, giving me a better understanding the key Leninist texts and debates and in what context they were written, and some very cool asides about bad as women and anarchists doing while shit.

I would recommend it with a caveat, if you can't stand Communists or Lenin enough to get through a history text, then skip it, or read the critical afterword before investing in the rest of the text to make you feel better.